Label

Senin, 23 April 2012

assignment 5: Approaches to Discourse


·         Speech act  (Austin 1955, Searle 1969)
It focuses on interpretation rather than the production of utterances in discourse.
·         Interactional sociolinguistics (Gumperz 1982, Goffman 1959-1981)
It centrally concerned with the importance of context in the production and interpretation of discourse. unit of analysis of interactional sociolinguistics  is the turn in conversation.
·         Ethnography of Communication (Dell Hymes (1972b, 1974)
Concerned with understanding the social context of linguistic interactions: ‘who says what to whom, when, where. Why, and how’. The unit of analysis is speech event.
·         Pragmatics (Grice 1975, Leech 1983, Levinson 1983)
At the base of pragmatic approach to conversation analysis is Gricean’s co-operative principle (CP) which seeks to account for not only how participants decide what to DO next in conversation, but also how interlocutors go about interpreting what the previous speaker has just done.
·         Conversation Analysis (CA)  (Harold Garfinkel 1960s-1970s)
CA is a branch of ethnomethodology. There are two grossly apparent facts: a) only one person speaks at a time, and b) speakers change recurs.
·         Variation Analysis (Labov 1972a, Labov and Waletzky1967)
Although typically focused on social and linguistic constraints on semantically equivalent variants, the approach has also been extended to texts.

Rabu, 18 April 2012

Assignment 4: Discourse Analysis

Discourse analysis describes a range of research approaches that focus on the use of language. it has been used to understand a wide range of texts including natural speech, internet communication, political rhetoric, interview, journals, etc.
 Some (but not all) forms of discourse analysis have an explicit focus on the relationship between discourse and power, as dominant discourses define what is seen as truth within a given context.

There are some examples of discourse analysis types:

  • Conversation analysis focuses on the ways in which language is used like how people reply to a spoken invitation, or the word used in any utterance.
  • Discursive psychology applies the notion of discourse to psychological topics.
  • Critical discourse analysis considers the social power implications
  • Foucauldian discourse analysis based on the ideas of Foucault, consider the development and changes of discourses overtime.

Discourse analysis approaches:


Speech act

Speech act theory is concerned with what people do with language or it is concerned with the function of language.
Each speech act consists of 3 components:
                 Locutionary act (the actual words which the speaker is saying);
                 Illocutionary act (the intention of the speaker);
                 Perlocutionary act (the effect of the utterance on the hearer).

Pragmatics

It is used to explain how we interpret implicatures. There are two types of implicatures:
       Conventional implicatures do not require any particular context in order to be understood (or inferred)
       Conversational implicatures are context – dependant. What is implied varies according to the context of an utterance.


Interactional Sociolinguistics

Centrally concerned with the importance of context in the production and interpretation of discourse.

Ethnography of Communication

Concerned with understanding the social context of linguistic interactions: ‘who says what to whom, when, where. Why, and how’.

Conversational Analysis

concern: to understand how social members make sense of everyday life.

Variation Analysis
fundamental narrative structures are evident in spoken narratives of personal experience.

Structural-Functional Approaches to Spoken Discourse

Refers to two major approaches to discourse analysis which have relevance to the analysis of casual conversation


The contribution of pragmatics to Discourse Analysis is a set of principles that constrains speakers’ sequential choices in a text and allows hearers to recognize speaker’s intentions.

Source:
Pustejovsky, James. Discourse analysis. Retrieved from http://pages.cs.brandeis.edu/~jamesp/classes/usem40a06/slides/DiscourseAnalysis.ppt  on 18 April 2012
Discourse Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.cprjournal.com/documents/discourseAnalysis.pdf on 18 April 2012


Rabu, 11 April 2012

Assignment 3 COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE

COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE


Discourse Competence
Discourse competence concerns the selection, sequencing and arrangement of words, structures, sentences and utterances to achieve a unified spoken or written text. There are many sub-areas that contribute to discourse competence, such as:
·         Cohesion
·         Deixis
·         Coherence
·         Generic structure
·         Conversational structure

Linguistic competence
 Linguistic competence is historically the most thoroughly discussed component of our model. It comprises the basic elements of communication: its systematic aspect (including meaning, word-building process) to linguistic competence, and lexical phrases to actional and discourse competence. Components of linguistic competence:
·         Syntax
·         Morphology
·         Lexicon
·         Phonology
·         Orthography

Actional competence
It defined as competence in conveying and understanding communicative intent. It matches actional intent with lngustic form based on the knowledge of an inventory of verbal schemata that carry illocutionary force. Actional competence is closely related to “interlanguage pragmatic” which has been defined as “the study of nonnative speakers’ use and acquisition of linguistic action patterns in a second language.”
Components of actional competence are:
  •  Knowledge of language function: interpersonal exchange, information, opinion, feeling, suasion, problems, future scenarios.
  • Knowledge of speech act sets.


Socio cultural competence
It refers to the speakers’ knowledge of how to express messages appropriately within the overall social and cultural context of communication, in accordance with the pragmatic factors related to variation in language use. In this case, language is not simply as a communication coding system, but also an integral part of individual’s identity and the most important channel os social organization. Raising socio cultural awareness is not an easy task, because socio cultural rules and normative patterns of expected or acceptable behavior have not yet been adequately analyzed and described. Social cultural variables are:
·         Social contextual factors
·         Stylistic appropriateness factors
·         Cultural factors
·         Non-verbal communicative factors

Strategic competence
It defined as knowledge of communication strategies and how to use them. Work on communication strategies has typically highlighted three functions of strategy use from three different perspectives:
a)      Psycholinguistic perspective
Communication strategies are also verbal plans used to overcome problems in reaching communicative goal.
b)      Interactional perspective
Communicative strategies involve appeals for help as well as other cooperative problem solving behaviors which occur after some problem has surfaced during the communication.
c)       Maintenance perspective
Communicative strategies are means of keeping the communication channel open in the face of communication difficulties and playing for time to think and to make speech plans.

Source:
Celce-muria, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrel,S. (1995). Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://escholarship.ucop.edu/uc/item/2928w4zj 7 April 2012

Rabu, 04 April 2012

Assignment 2 HISTORY OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Communicative approach views language as system for communication. The goal of language teaching in this approach is that learners are able to communicate in the target language. It will include semantic and social function, not only linguistics structures.  In communicative approach, there is inter relatedness of skills, not only in written and oral, but also in the need to have experience of communication, to participate in negotiation of meaning. Language has seen many changes and we may group trends in language teaching in the last 50 years into three phases.

Phase 1 : Traditional Approaches (up to the late 1960s)
Prior to the twentieth century, language teaching methodology vacillated between two approaches:  getting learners to use language vs getting learners to analyze a language. During the renaissance, the formal study like grammar was very popular supported by the mass production of books. Traditional approaches in this phase also gave priority to grammatical competence as the basis of language proficiency. Grammar could be learned through direct instruction and methodology that use repetitive practice and drilling. There were two approaches in teaching grammar:
Deductive : students are presented with rule s to practice.
Inductive : students are given examples containing rules to work with.
Techniques that employed in this phase are: memorization of dialogs, question and answer practice, substitution drill, and various forms of guided speaking and writing practice. One of the grammar based methodology known as P-P-P cycle:
Presentation : presentation of a new grammar structure.
Practice : students practice using the new structure in controlled context.
Production : students practice using their own content or information.
Under the influence of CLT theory, grammar based methodology such as P-P-P cycle has been replaced by fluency based on interactive small-group work.

Phase 2 : Classic Communicative Language Teaching (1970s to 1990s)
In the 1970s the traditional language teaching approaches fell out of fashion. People began to question the centrality of grammar and shifted their attention to the knowledge and skill to use grammar for communicative purposes. What was used was communicative competence which was answered by CLT as a new approach to language teaching in 70s and 80s. The communicative competence consisting of : grammatical competence, Discourse competence, Sociocultural competence, and strategic competence.  The first one refers to sentence level grammatical forms, the ability to recognize lexical, morphological, syntactic, and phonological feature. Discourse competence is concerned with the interconnectedness of a series of utterances, words or phrases from text. Sociocultural competence extends well beyond linguistics forms and the social rule. It was argued that a syllabus should identify the language aspect to develop the learner’s communicative competence.
1. The purpose for which learner whishes to acquire the target language, for example : English for business purposes.
2. Setting in which they will use the language, for example: in office, in a store.
3. The social role assumed, fro example: as traveler, as a sales person.
4. The communicative events in which the learner will participate, like everyday situation, academic situation.
5. The language functions such as making introductions, giving explanations.
6. The notions or concept involved, like leisure, finance, history.
7. The skill involved in “knitting together” discourse role and rhetorical skills for storytelling, giving presentation, and so on.
8. The variety that will be needed (American, Australian, or British English )
9. The grammar content.
10. The lexical content.
New syllabus type which proposed by advocates of CLT:
A skill-based syllabus: focuses on the four skills and breaks them into their micro skills.
A functional syllabus: organized according to the functions that should be carried out by students.

Phase 3: Current Communicative Language Teaching
There are ten core assumption of current CLT:
1. Second language learning is facilitated when learners are engaged in interaction and meaningful communication.
2. Effective classroom learning tasks provide opportunities for students to develop communication.
3. Meaningful communication result from students processing content that is relevant, purposeful, interesting, and engaging.
4. Communication is a holistic process that often calls upon the use of several language skills or modalities.
5. Language learning facilitated by activities that involves inductive rules of language and language analysis and reflection.
6. Language learning is a gradual process.
7. Learners develop their own routes to language learning.
8. Successful language learning involves the use of effective learning and communication strategies.
9. Teacher has role as a facilitator in classroom.
10. Classroom is a community where learners learn through collaboration and sharing.
Characteristics of CLT classroom activities:
Grammar is not taught in isolation but arises out of a communicative task.
Use problem solving, information sharing, and role play.
Provide opportunities for both inductive and deductive grammar.
Use content that connect to students’ life and interest.
Allow students to personalize learning.
Use authentic texts to create interest and provide valid models.
Key components of the shift toward CLT are focus on:
1. The role of learners rather than the external stimuli.
2. The learning process rather than the product.
3. Social nature rather than the external on students as separate.
4. Diversity among learners and view this as resource to be recognized and appreciated.
5. The view of those internal to the classroom rather than those who come from outside.
6. Connecting the school with the world beyond.
7. Help students to understand the purpose of learning and develop their own purpose.
8. A whole-to-part orientation instead of a part-to-whole approach.

References:
Celce – Murcia, M. 2001. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language Third Edition. Unit 1. Teaching Methodology, Topic 1 & Topic 2
Richard, J.C. 2005. Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press